POST-IMPERIAL
An Empire without clothes
Drafted April–May 2026. Section IV updated May 7 to reflect the Saudi airspace denial that materialized between drafting and publication. Section II updated May 9 to reflect the UAE’s confirmed OPEC exit (announced April 28, effective May 1, 2026). The framework predicted the pattern that produced the events. That’s part of why I’m publishing now rather than waiting for further refinement. Anyone reading this after the next few news cycles should know the analysis was assembled before the confirmations, not after.
A note on what this is. This paper is analytical. It is not a call to action. The point is to give a structural account of what is happening, so people stop interpreting separate symptoms as separate problems. I am not telling you what to do about it. I do not have the solution. The structures that are failing are bigger than any one person, and pretending otherwise would be exactly the dishonesty this paper is trying to refuse.
What I can offer is a framework. If it lands, the rest of the reasoning follows on its own. After that, the call to action is someone else’s job. Mine is just to clear the ground.
The thesis, in one sentence. The structure that has organized global economic and political life for three generations is in late-stage decline, the decline is structural rather than cyclical, and it will keep failing because the conditions that produced it no longer exist.
What the paper covers, in order. I. Why the institutions cannot tell you what is happening.
II. The four pillars holding up the structure, and why each one is in motion at once.
III. The hidden premise underneath modern economic discourse, which most arguments about money never touch.
IV. The pattern of self-installation. How the empire wired its own house with the hardware that is now tripping it.
V. Why China and Russia are not what mainstream analysis says they are. What kind of opponents they actually are, and what kind of opponents they are not.
VI. What the bill looks like at the kitchen table. Receipts as a more honest measurement than the official numbers.
VII. Why the population landing inside the decline is unusually unable to absorb shocks. The historical pattern of what comes next.
VIII. What this analysis asks of the reader, which is not a solution.
References for the specific claims are numbered inline and listed at the end.
I. Why the institutions cannot tell you. The American century is over.
The people with the credentials to say so will not say so. Their entire framework is built on the assumption that it isn’t. Acknowledging it would mean acknowledging that the institutions they work for, write for, advise, and build their authority inside are standing on a floor that has stopped existing. Most of them cannot do that without losing the position from which they speak. So they don’t.
I am writing this from a job site. I have no credentials in any of this. I read what the credentialed people write, and I have been watching them be wrong about the most important things for fifteen years. This is what I think is happening, why, and what it means for the people who are about to be inside it without warning.
The decline shows up at the kitchen table as a series of separate problems with separate causes. Mozzarella up thirty-three percent in two weeks. Gas at four-eighteen. Federal interest payments now higher than the entire defense budget.¹ The mortgage rate your kid would have to pay if your kid could afford a house, which your kid cannot. The grocery bill that has now permanently broken whatever budget you had two years ago. These problems are connected in a way most of us feel rather than articulate.
The reason you are not being told they are the same problem is that the institutions whose job is to tell you cannot tell you. The structure is what funds them. The structure is what produces their authority. They cannot describe its failure without describing the end of their own legitimacy. So they describe the items separately, and the items pile up, and you are left to construct your own explanation from talk radio, social media, half-remembered economics class, and whatever your neighbor’s brother saw on YouTube. The wrongness of the explanation you arrive at is itself a downstream effect of the structure that has failed to give you the right one.
That is the first thing the paper asks you to hold. Everything that follows depends on it.
II. The four pillars. The structure rests on four pillars. They have been treated as natural rather than constructed for so long that their construction has become invisible.
Military. The United States operated the only globally projectable military force in existence, and that structure was built around the assumption that this force could enforce outcomes. It can’t. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen by proxy, the current Iran war. The structure is being asked to absorb the discovery that the threats no longer threaten and the deterrent no longer deters. Munitions deplete. Political tolerance erodes. Allies decline to be dragged in. The actors the force was supposed to deter have discovered they can wait it out.
The receipts on this are concrete. The current Iran war has burned through the bulk of US JASSM-ER cruise missile inventory; by early April 2026 the global stockpile available outside the Iran theater had dropped to roughly 425 missiles.² Patriot interceptor stocks are at concerning levels and the Pentagon’s own war games against China consistently model the US running out of long-range precision munitions in the first seven to fourteen days of a serious Pacific war.³ Chinese shipbuilding capacity is roughly two hundred and thirty times that of US shipbuilding by tonnage, and the gap widens every quarter.⁴ These are not partisan numbers. They are arithmetic.
Monetary. The dollar’s role as the global reserve currency was set at Bretton Woods in 1944 and consolidated through the 1970s by what gets called the petrodollar arrangement. It was not a formal treaty, despite what the internet keeps telling you. It was an emergent system in which Saudi Arabia and the broader OPEC bloc sold oil for dollars and recycled the proceeds into US Treasuries, in exchange for American security guarantees and military aid.⁵ ⁶ The arrangement was load-bearing for dollar hegemony because it produced structural global demand for dollars regardless of how many were issued.
The arrangement is now being deliberately dismantled by the same actors that built it. Saudi Arabia joined BRICS+ in 2024. Saudi-China oil-for-yuan negotiations have been live since 2022.⁷ China launched yuan-denominated oil futures contracts in 2018. The UAE formally exited OPEC and OPEC+ on May 1, 2026, after announcing the departure on April 28 — the third-largest producer in the cartel walking out during an active regional war, citing “national interests.”⁸ Reserve currency status is not collapsing in a single event. It is being deconstructed one hedge at a time, by states that have decided the cost of dollar dependence has started to exceed the benefit.
Alliance. The American security architecture was built on allied countries deriving enough benefit from inclusion to absorb the costs. The math has been changing for years. Saudi Arabia openly hedges with China. India refuses to sanction Russia. Germany builds parallel arrangements with the Gulf for energy. Turkey moved closer to Russia after the Kurdish situation in Syria, and is now closer to BRICS than to NATO on most working questions.⁹ None of these is a defection. They are insurance policies against the empire failing in ways its allies cannot afford to be caught inside. The empire reads their actions as betrayal, while publicly destroying the credibility and stability of NATO and its members.¹⁰
Cultural. The American model — products, entertainment, language, institutions other countries copied — depended on the empire being seen as worth emulating. That perception is now broken in most of the world that used to hold it. The decline of cultural authority is the slowest of the four to fall and the most diffuse, but it is falling. The rest of the world watches American politics with bemusement now, not admiration. The post-Kabul recalibration was the visible turning point, but the trend was older than that.
When all four pillars are in motion at once, the structure they hold up is not in cyclical decline. It is in regime change.
III. The hidden premise. There is a thing economic discourse in this country has not been able to say out loud, and it is worth saying, because once you see it you cannot un-see it.
Modern monetary theory, MMT, is the closest thing American economic discourse has produced to an honest description of how the federal government actually finances itself. Its central insight is correct. A sovereign currency issuer is constrained by real resources and inflation, not by running out of money. The United States cannot run out of dollars because it makes the dollars.
What MMT does not say out loud is that its viability depends on a non-monetary precondition. MMT works only as long as the rest of the world continues to accept the issuing currency at face value. If the world keeps absorbing your dollars, you can issue all you want, the inflation gets exported, and the deficits do not bind. If the world stops absorbing them, your inflation comes home, your currency depreciates, your real interest rates rise, and the theory cannot wave any of it away — because what’s happening is no longer an artifact of bad policy. It’s the world repricing your money against a new structural reality.
The petrodollar arrangement was the structural mechanism that produced the world’s willingness to absorb dollars at face value for two generations. As long as everyone needed dollars to buy oil, dollars stayed valuable regardless of how many were issued. That arrangement was not a market outcome. It was the cumulative product of three generations of American intervention. Coups, wars, security agreements, threats, inducements that secured and preserved the cooperation of the OPEC states. Saudi Arabia in the 1970s did not voluntarily price oil exclusively in dollars because dollars were objectively the best unit of account. Saudi Arabia priced oil in dollars because the alternative — diversifying out of the dollar — would have produced consequences for the regime that the United States had recently demonstrated, in Mossadegh’s Iran in 1953, the willingness to impose.¹¹
This is the part most people do not know. The dollar’s reserve status is not an inheritance from American economic strength. It is an inheritance from American imperial enforcement. When the enforcement weakens, the reserve status weakens with it. The thing the empire spent its capacity on is the thing that gave the empire the capacity to spend. When the project of maintaining the arrangement exhausts the capacity that maintained it, the whole apparatus unwinds at the same time, because the apparatus was always one thing, not separate things that happened to share an issuing country.
The same logic applies to every vassal state running an MMT-adjacent model under American backstop. Japan’s three-decade endurance of debt-to-GDP above 200 percent is not evidence that high debt is sustainable in general. It is evidence that high debt is sustainable when you have the United States as your security guarantor, your trade backstop, and your reference point for monetary stability. When the United States moves, the floor under every vassal moves. The bill arrives simultaneously across the architecture. Not in sequence. Simultaneously. That is the part nobody is pricing in.
IV. The installation pattern. The cleanest way to describe what American foreign policy has done over the last thirty years is to picture a man walking around his own house sticking suction-cup dildos to the walls so he can accidentally trip and fuck himself.
The word that matters is accidentally. The empire is not being attacked. The empire is not getting fucked on purpose by an adversary. The empire is installing the hardware itself, on its own walls, in its own house, and then wandering around in the dark going how did this happen while Russia and China are standing outside the window with binoculars going he is putting another one above the fireplace, watch.
Here is the floor plan.
Iraq, on the living room wall. We will be greeted as liberators. Eight years tripping into it face-first. Four thousand American dead. Six hundred thousand Iraqi dead by the conservative counts. Trillions spent. Iran becomes the dominant regional power in the vacuum the install created. The empire installed the thing that produced the problem the empire is now trying to solve with more installations.
Libya, in the hallway. Took out Gaddafi in 2011 without a post-war plan. Failed state. Open-air weapons market. The weapons end up in Syria, in Mali, in Niger, every place the empire later spends money trying to stabilize. Walk down the hall, trip, get fucked, act surprised.
Syria, on the bathroom door. Armed “moderate rebels” who turned out not to be moderate. Created the conditions for ISIS. Then armed the Kurds to fight ISIS, which infuriated Turkey, a NATO ally, which pushed Erdogan toward Russia, which weakened the southern flank, which is now the fault line threatening the whole NATO architecture a decade later. One install in Syria and Turkey is at the BRICS doorstep.
Afghanistan, on the ceiling. Twenty years. Two trillion dollars. The empire really went for ambition on this one. The whole world watched the ladder fall. The images from Kabul did not just end American credibility in Central Asia. They ended it everywhere. Every ally on earth watched and asked if this is how they leave, what is the security guarantee actually worth?
Ukraine, on the kitchen wall. Expanded NATO to Russia’s doorstep for thirty years. Ignored every red line Moscow drew. Encouraged Ukrainian integration into the Western security architecture without ever committing to defend it. Then acted shocked when Russia invaded. Then supported Ukraine enough to bleed but not enough to win. Depleted NATO munitions stockpiles. Pushed Russia into China’s arms permanently. The two adversaries the empire most needed to keep separated are now in a strategic partnership at a depth that did not exist five years ago.
Iran, on the front door. This is the masterwork. The empire assassinated Khamenei during active negotiations where Iran was making concessions. Used the diplomatic positioning to confirm leadership locations.¹² Burned every off-ramp. Trapped itself in a war with no exit, against a country that controls the Strait of Hormuz, inside mountains, with eighty-eight million people who have been preparing for forty-five years, while simultaneously depleting the weapons it needs for China, destabilizing every ally in the region, pushing Turkey toward a NATO crisis, and watching gas hit six dollars a gallon at the pump.
And the deeper category error: Iran is not a nation-state in the modern sense the empire’s toolkit was built for. It is a 2,500-year civilizational continuity currently operating in Islamic Republic form. You can topple a regime. You cannot topple a civilization. The 1953 Mossadegh coup produced the 1979 revolution twenty-six years later. Killing Khamenei doesn’t kill the civilization that produced him. It produces the next iteration that has been told the empire killed the previous one. The eighty-eight million people preparing for forty-five years aren’t preparing as individuals. They’re the latest generation of a multi-millennial continuity. The empire’s regime-change reflexes are calibrated to a category Iran doesn’t fit.
And then on Sunday, May 3, the empire announced an operation called Project Freedom on social media without telling the regional partners whose airspace and basing it depended on. Saudi Arabia found out from Truth Social. Saudi said no. The Crown Prince did not yield on the phone with the President. Inside seventy-two hours the operation collapsed. The collapse was rebranded as diplomatic progress on a peace deal that contains approximately the terms Iran has been demanding for two months, including the reopening of Hormuz that the empire had spent two months trying to enforce by other means.¹³
Two days from announcement to walkback. Visible to anyone with a phone in real time. The hardware on the front door tripped him the second he opened it. He installed it himself. He cannot remove it. He folded the hand and called it a clever play.
The progression from the living room wall to the front door is the progression from regional entanglement to structural entrapment. By the time you have installed hardware on your own front door, you cannot leave the house without hitting it.
And the foreign tour is only half the install list. There is more hardware inside the house, and the empire put it there too.
The Fed chairman’s desk, in the office. Installed as TARP in 2008. Scaled up as QE through three administrations. The balance sheet went from nine hundred billion to nearly nine trillion and has not come close to returning. Zero-interest-rate policy held for the better part of a decade past the emergency that justified it, snapped back to zero in 2020, and was raised again only after consumer inflation peaked above nine percent in 2022. Every install was sold as temporary. None of them were temporary. The desk is now covered. Every market participant on earth knows the Fed cannot stop bailing out the next thing, because the last bailout installed the moral hazard that produced this thing. The 2019 repo crisis. SVB. The 2023 regional banking spasm. Each one a downstream effect of the prior bailout. Each one met with a bigger bailout. Each one removing a little more of the price discovery mechanism the productive economy depends on. The chairman cannot get up from the desk, because the desk is what the position has been installing for almost two decades.
The national debt, in the basement. Thirty-six trillion dollars and rising geometrically. Federal interest payments now exceed the entire defense budget. Cannot be repaid, because the productive capacity to service it was offshored thirty years ago. Cannot be inflated away, because the inflation collapses the reserve currency status that is the only thing keeping the debt serviceable in the first place. Cannot be defaulted on, because every pension fund, sovereign wealth fund, and central bank on earth is collateralized by Treasuries, which means default is not financial, it is geopolitical. The debt is the suction cup in the basement load-bearing wall. Pulling it produces structural collapse. Leaving it produces structural collapse. The empire is in the room with it and cannot leave the room.
The manufacturing base, in the garage where the tools used to be. Offshored over thirty years through NAFTA, WTO accession, China PNTR, and a corporate tax regime engineered to reward the relocation of productive capacity overseas. Sold as comparative advantage and the service economy of the future. What it actually was: the dismantling of the industrial substrate that produced the imperial premium in the first place. Between 2000 and 2010 alone, the United States lost nearly six million domestic manufacturing jobs.¹⁴ The empire cannot manufacture artillery shells fast enough for Ukraine. Cannot manufacture missiles fast enough for Iran. Cannot manufacture chips without Taiwan. Cannot manufacture rare earths without China. It maintains F-35 production through Specialty Metals Clause waivers because the supply chain still depends on Chinese alloys.¹⁵ The garage is empty. The tools are gone. The empire sold them to the people it is now fighting.
This is the pattern. Each install was sold to the public as a load-bearing structural improvement. Each install was actually surface-mounted hardware that looked like it would hold and then didn’t when the conditions shifted. Conditions always shift — that’s what conditions do. The empire knows this. The analysts who staffed each install knew it. The install happened anyway, because the politics of the moment required something to be put on the wall, a suction cup is cheaper than a screw anchor, and twenty years is longer than the political horizon of the people doing the installing.
Russia did not put a single piece of hardware on a single wall. Neither did China. They didn’t have to. They just had to wait while the empire did the interior decorating. The board fills itself when your opponent is too busy fucking himself to notice you are placing stones.
I am using the crude metaphor rather than a more polite one because the polite ones lie. The empire is not a chess player calibrating clients across a board. The empire is a contractor who keeps gluing things to the wall, walking away, and pretending to be surprised when they fall off. The structural analysis is in the vulgarity, not despite it.
V. The patient observer and the cornered one. The standard analytical default in American foreign policy discourse is that all great powers behave the way the United States did, which means China must want to be the next United States and Russia must want to reconstitute the Soviet Union. The default is wrong about both. It’s wrong in different ways, and the distinction matters.
China is the patient observer. China watched the empire pay the imperial-maintenance bill for fifty years and decided not to. This isn’t virtue — they’re not better people. It’s strategic learning from an experiment that ran in front of them for half a century. They saw what the project of maintaining a global hegemonic order costs, watched what it does to the country running it, and built something different. The Iran-China twenty-five-year agreement is commercial, not military-alliance.¹⁶ The Belt and Road Initiative is transactional, building parallel architecture without the security obligations that produced American overstretch. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization is deliberately not a military alliance. BRICS is explicitly not a binding-commitment bloc. China is construction crew, not invading army. They’re building next to the empire’s collapsing structure, and they’re doing it without the moves that produce imperial overstretch — because they watched imperial overstretch from the outside and decided the cost was unacceptable.
Russia is something else, and the difference matters. Russia spent the first fifteen years after the Cold War trying to integrate into the Western order. Joined the G8. Partnered with NATO under the Founding Act. Hosted summits. Even sounded out NATO membership in the late nineties. The empire spent the same fifteen years expanding NATO eastward despite the 1990 Baker-Gorbachev assurances that NATO would not move “one inch east,”¹⁷ ignoring Russian red lines at Bucharest in 2008 when Ukraine and Georgia were promised eventual membership, then again in 2014, then again in the December 2021 security proposals that the West refused to negotiate. Russia’s behavior from 2000 to 2014 was patient-observer in shape. The behavior since 2022 is not.
The Russian operation in Ukraine is a mechanized invasion of a sovereign neighbor. Cities are being leveled. Civilians are dying. Millions are displaced. None of that is patient observation. It is a reaction to consistent provocations from the U.S. imperial system.
Structurally, the war is what a cornered regional power does. The warnings about what NATO expansion would eventually produce came from inside the Western establishment, not from outside it. George Kennan called it “the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era” in 1997.¹⁸ John Mearsheimer wrote about the trap structurally for thirty years.¹⁹ William Burns, who would later serve as CIA Director from 2021 to 2025, wrote a 2008 cable as ambassador to Moscow titled Nyet Means Nyet warning that NATO membership for Ukraine was the brightest of all redlines for the Russian elite, that the consequences would include possible civil war in Ukraine and a forced Russian intervention.²⁰ He described what happened in 2022 fourteen years before it happened. The warnings were dismissed by the people running the policy because the policy felt costless at the time. The cost arrived in 2022.
This is the second pattern of the paper. The empire produced two different responses from two different powers, both downstream of the same imperial behavior. China learned: do not put yourself in the position where you have to use force to defend yourself. Russia learned: when you have to use force, use it decisively, and do not trust the West to hold to its word. Neither power is doing what they are doing because they are imperial in the way the United States is. They are doing what they are doing because they were standing next to the empire’s experiment and watching it fail in real time.
The thing the empire could do that would be worst for everyone, including itself, would be to start a war specifically to force formal bloc consolidation. A multipolar world with formal blocs is one the empire knows how to navigate. A multipolar world without formal blocs is one it cannot. Some of the people inside the foreign policy apparatus understand this. Some of them are actively working to force the consolidation. Watch which ones win the internal fight.
The other risk is bloc capture by China of Russia. The longer the war runs, the more dependent Russia becomes on Chinese economic support, the less Russia can sustain anything resembling the patient-observer posture China is trying to maintain. The empire’s pressure on Russia has produced exactly the alliance the empire most needed to prevent, and the alliance is deepening because the war is continuing. This is what people mean when they say the empire is fucking itself. It is not metaphor. It is a description of the consequences of policy choices made by people who knew at the time what the consequences would be and made them anyway.
VI. What comes home. The bill for three generations of intervention lands at the level of ordinary life as a series of small permanent reductions in what your money will buy and what your country can hold up.
Mozzarella up thirty-three percent in two weeks. That is one product at one store, but the pattern across categories is the same. The receipts are the data. Personal-inflation-from-receipts is a more accurate measure of what is actually happening than the official number, because the official number is built to undercount the things that hit you hardest. If you keep your grocery receipts for a month and compare them to the same month last year, you will get a number that looks nothing like the CPI, and the difference between what you are getting and what you are being told you are getting is itself part of the structural problem.²¹ ²²
Gas is at four-eighteen at the time of writing, with regional spikes above five and tracking toward six in some markets. The federal government is now spending more on interest payments than on the entire military.¹ Housing has made household formation impossible for cohorts of younger people whose parents’ generation owned homes. Consumer debt is at record highs. Delinquencies are rising. Rent in most cities tracks closer to half of pre-tax income than the third the postwar arrangement implied was the upper bound.
Each of these gets discussed as its own item with its own cause. Each item, separately, has its own cause. Inflation is the Fed’s fault, or the supply chain’s fault, or the previous administration’s fault, or the next administration’s fault. The connection between the items, which is the structure failing, is not available as an explanation in mainstream discourse. So you get fifty separate problems with fifty separate proposed fixes, none of which work, because none of them are addressing the actual problem.
The actual problem is that the empire is unwinding the imperial premium on American life that was built into prices for sixty years, and the unwinding shows up as a slow permanent reduction in what an American paycheck will buy. You are paying for three generations of intervention in the form of your grocery bill and your gas tank. You were never told you were paying for it. The institutions whose job was to tell you cannot tell you. So you experience it as a series of mysterious price increases attributable to whoever is currently in office, and the people currently in office accept the blame because it is more convenient for them than the alternative, which is admitting that they cannot do anything about it because the thing producing it is bigger than any administration.
There is one specific case worth naming, because it is the model for what collective punishment looks like as a style of governance, and the empire is now scaling it up. Cuba. The United States has been collectively punishing eleven million Cubans for sixty-three years for the geopolitical sin of being communist next door. The blockade is illegal under international law, opposed annually by an overwhelming majority of the UN General Assembly for thirty-three consecutive years — with the United States and Israel as the only consistent dissenting votes — and currently being expanded under the second Trump administration to cover any country that supplies oil to the island.²³ The Cuban economy is in humanitarian collapse. People are dying for medicine that exists thirty miles away.
This is what an empire that can no longer afford to be magnanimous does when it cannot get its way. It punishes the population. Forever. The Cuba template is the template the empire is going to start applying to other countries it cannot project force into anymore. Watch for it. The shape will be the same. Sanctions, blockade, secondary sanctions on third parties, weaponization of the dollar payment system. The Cuba that is coming for the others.
VII. The pulverization. The structural decline is landing on a population whose capacity to absorb shocks has been systematically reduced over the past forty years. The reduction was not an accident. It was the cumulative effect of policy choices that prioritized labor mobility, asset appreciation, and individual optimization over collective stability. People moved for jobs. People moved for cheaper housing. People moved away from the cities they grew up in and into apartment complexes whose neighbors they did not know and exurbs designed for spatial separation rather than community. People built lives optimized for the conditions of the long American boom and entered a period in which those conditions no longer hold.
Worth saying out loud, because most American discourse refuses to: institutionalized civilian atomization is not a new tool, and it is not unique to the United States. It is a known feature of authoritarian governance in the twentieth century. China and Russia, in their respective Communist phases, built civilian-control systems explicitly around residential separation, neighborhood surveillance, and the deliberate disruption of pre-political community ties. The textbook on this is well-developed. It is taught in political science programs. The architecture, when it works, produces populations that are politically governable precisely because they cannot organize horizontally with the people physically nearest to them.
The American version of this is structurally different and produces similar effects. It was not engineered through state policy in the same direct way. It emerged through the interaction of housing markets, labor mobility, suburban design, and the financialization of urban density. Kowloon Walled City is the analytic limit case. Roughly fifty thousand people in two and a half hectares, vertical density without civic substrate, residents who lived feet from each other for decades and never built community because the architecture did not permit it. American apartment-density living in major cities is structurally similar in shape, if not in extremity. Neighbors who never meet. Buildings whose residents share elevators for years and exchange no names. Communities that exist on paper as zip codes and not in practice as relationships.²⁴
More than half of Americans cannot name two of their immediate neighbors.²⁵ The cooperation previous generations produced under stress is not available in the same way, and the historical record on what happens when atomized populations face sustained economic-political stress is not encouraging.
The reference cases are not natural disasters. The 2003 New York blackout produced cooperation. The 2021 Texas freeze produced cooperation. Those were natural disasters. Nobody had a human enemy to project the suffering onto. Political-economic shocks produce a different pattern entirely. 1968. 1992. 2014. 2020. Riots in dozens of cities simultaneously, federal force projection in response, accelerated political polarization, structural changes to the legal architecture that outlasted the precipitating events by decades.
The 2026 conditions are worse than 1968 in the relational dimension and worse than 2020 in the economic dimension. What comes out the other side isn’t predictable in detail. The shape is. The shape involves mass political mobilization without ideological substrate, because the ideological substrate has been deliberately suppressed for forty years by institutions that found populations easier to govern when the populations could not articulate why they were unhappy. What you get out the other end is a population that knows something is wrong and cannot organize what it knows. The institutional response will be technocratic-elite reflex — the masses cannot be trusted — which is itself part of the problem, because the experts are part of the order that produced the disorder. The loop deepens.
This is the part where the analysis gets hardest to write, because the answer to what should be done about this is not actually clear, and pretending it is would be exactly the dishonesty this paper is trying to refuse. What I can say is that the institutional carriers for new political frames do not yet exist, and that someone has to be doing the frame-building work at kitchen tables and in group chats and in conversations with neighbors so that when the carriers do exist there is something for them to carry.
That work is unglamorous. It does not produce metrics. It is mostly invisible. It is also, as far as I can tell, the only thing that matters.
VIII. What this paper asks. The paper asks one thing. Stop interpreting each new degradation as an isolated event and start seeing them as what they are. The predictable downstream effects of a structure failing.
That single interpretive shift makes a great deal of subsequent reasoning possible. The political class will not address the conditions because the political class is constituted by the structure that is failing. The media cannot describe what is happening because the media is funded by the same advertising economy that depends on the structure remaining intact. Allied countries are quietly building parallel architecture because they are. Your grocery bill makes no sense relative to the inflation number because the inflation number is not measuring what is actually happening to you.
The paper does not ask you to produce the solution. The solution is not within your gift. The structures that are failing are larger than any individual response. They will keep failing regardless of what you do.
What is within your gift is the choice of what to build inside the failure.
The relationships. The standards. The small communities. The local resilience. The shared explanations of what is happening. The people you can rely on. The people who can rely on you. The skills you would teach your kid if you had the time. The land you would own jointly with your neighbors if you trusted your neighbors. The network of people who would help you if your house caught fire. The thing you would do if you were not afraid.
These are not solutions to the structural problem. They are habitable conditions you build because the structural problem is going to keep happening regardless of whether you build them. They are also, not coincidentally, the only thing the empire never figured out how to manufacture and never figured out how to monetize and never figured out how to tax. They have always been outside its reach. They will be there after it is over.
I am writing this because someone has to. The people with the credentials to say it won’t. So you have it from a tradesman with a kitchen table and time. Take what is useful. Leave what is not. Argue with the rest. Pass it to whoever it might help. Don’t pay for it. Don’t credential me. Don’t tell me I should put my name on it. I have my reasons for not putting my name on it. You have your reasons for being suspicious of unsigned work. We will both have to live with our reasons.
That is the work. The analysis exists to clear the ground for it.
— A Guy
I wrote this paper in collaboration with Claude, Anthropic’s AI system. I’m a commercial construction plumbing superintendent. Between the job and my children, the amount of time I have for full-time academic work is none.
That’s relevant because the kind of analysis this paper attempts has historically required institutional support. Academic appointments. Think-tank fellowships. The kind of position that pays you to read and write all day. I don’t have any of that.
I’m naming the collaboration directly because hiding it would be exactly the kind of credentialing dishonesty the paper is arguing against. The institutions that gate analysis through credentials are part of the structure that’s failing. One of the things emerging on the other side is the possibility of working-class people producing the analysis the credentialed class refuses to produce, using tools the credentialed class doesn’t yet know how to use. That’s part of the post-imperial condition.
If you’re suspicious of the methodology, that’s appropriate. Test the arguments. Check the citations. The analysis stands or falls on its own merits.
I use Claude because it’s available, it’s good at the patient work, and using it doesn’t depend on permission from any institution. The work continues at the kitchen table and on the job site whether anyone validates it or not.
Works Cited
Congressional Budget Office. The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2024 to 2034. CBO, Feb. 2024, www.cbo.gov/publication/59710.
Capaccio, Anthony. “Iran War: US Commits Most JASSM-ER Missiles, Draws From Global Stockpiles.” Bloomberg, 4 Apr. 2026.
Jones, Seth G. Empty Bins in a Wartime Environment: The Challenge to the U.S. Defense Industrial Base. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Jan. 2023.
Trevithick, Joseph. “Alarming Navy Intel Slide Warns of China’s 200 Times Greater Shipbuilding Capacity.” The War Zone, 11 Jul. 2023.
Spiro, David E. The Hidden Hand of American Hegemony: Petrodollar Recycling and International Markets. Cornell University Press, 1999.
Wong, Andrea. “The Untold Story Behind Saudi Arabia’s 41-Year U.S. Debt Secret.” Bloomberg, 30 May 2016.
Said, Summer, et al. “Saudi Arabia Considers Accepting Yuan Instead of Dollars for Chinese Oil Sales.” The Wall Street Journal, 15 Mar. 2022.
“UAE Leaves OPEC in Blow to Oil Cartel During War on Iran.” Al Jazeera, 28 Apr. 2026.
Kirişci, Kemal. “Why Is Turkey Betting on Russia?” Brookings, 15 Jul. 2019.
Messmer, Marion. “US Intentions Towards Greenland Threaten NATO’s Future. But European Countries Are Not Helpless.” Chatham House, 7 Jan. 2026, www.chathamhouse.org/2026/01/us-intentions-towards-greenland-threaten-natos-future-european-countries-are-not-helpless.
Kinzer, Stephen. All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
Trenta, Luca, and Arturo Jimenez-Bacardi. “Khamenei’s Killing and the Perilous Death of the Assassination Ban.” Just Security, 1 Apr. 2026, www.justsecurity.org/135015/khamenei-killing-perilous-death-assassination-ban/.
Gains, Mosheh, et al. “Trump’s Abrupt U-turn on a Plan to Reopen the Strait of Hormuz Came After Backlash from Allies.” NBC News, 6 May 2026.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics Survey: Manufacturing.” BLS, 2000–2010, www.bls.gov/ces/.
Capaccio, Anthony. “Pentagon Suspends F-35 Deliveries Over Chinese Alloy in Engine.” Bloomberg, 7 Sept. 2022.
Fassihi, Farnaz, and Steven Lee Myers. “China, With $400 Billion Iran Deal, Could Deepen Influence in Mideast.” The New York Times, 27 Mar. 2021.
Savranskaya, Svetlana, and Tom Blanton. “NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard.” National Security Archive, 12 Dec. 2017, nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early.
Kennan, George F. “A Fateful Error.” The New York Times, 5 Feb. 1997, p. A23.
Mearsheimer, John J. “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 93, no. 5, 2014, pp. 77–89.
Burns, William J. “Nyet Means Nyet: Russia’s NATO Enlargement Redlines.” Cable 08MOSCOW265, U.S. Embassy Moscow, 1 Feb. 2008. WikiLeaks, wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08MOSCOW265_a.html.
Hanke, Steve H., and Charles Bushnell. “On Measuring Hyperinflation: Venezuela’s Episode.” World Economics, vol. 18, no. 3, 2017, pp. 1–18.
Williams, John. “Alternate Consumer Inflation Measures.” Shadow Government Statistics, www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts.
United Nations General Assembly. Necessity of Ending the Economic, Commercial and Financial Embargo Imposed by the United States of America against Cuba. Resolution A/79/L.6, 30 Oct. 2024. UN Press Release GA/12650, press.un.org/en/2024/ga12650.doc.htm.
Girard, Greg, and Ian Lambot. City of Darkness: Life in Kowloon Walled City. Watermark, 1993.
Davis, Leslie, and Kim Parker. “A Half-Century After ‘Mister Rogers’ Debut, 5 Facts about Neighbors in U.S.” Pew Research Center, 15 Aug. 2019, www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/08/15/facts-about-neighbors-in-u-s/.
Thank you for this and I'm proud to be the first commenter. The information is far too frank for an average American to take in and appreciate. I think now most look at such information as a direct threat to their own unsupported views and opinions of the future. This reaction is also demonstrated when honest and frank articles regarding climate change are published. People seem not to believe the tea leaves anymore, regarding of who makes the tea. There are no learned sources, today everything that is published is suspect. This is what Trump and his supporters have done to this country. They have injected distrust, disbelief and lack of trust in and of others. Regarding the writer's localized and neighborhood solutions to the disconnect, these are steps I have advocated for years. The smart people with vision and the ability to adjust will take steps to protect their futures, others will expect such people to cushion their futures by sharing. I'm glad I'm so old that I won't see it.